CRGO Lamination Coating Types (Insulation Classes) — And What They Really Mean

If you’ve ever compared two “identical” CRGO (cold-rolled grain-oriented) steel quotes and wondered why core loss, noise, or rework risk doesn’t line up with the datasheet… the answer is often hiding in a few characters: the insulation coating class. Coatings are the invisible engineering layer between laminations—thin enough to ignore in a drawing, but important enough to change watts, heat, and long-term reliability in the field.

• Coatings reduce eddy-current losses by electrically separating laminations (higher interlaminar resistance = less circulating current between sheets).
• They protect the surface from handling, humidity, and some chemical exposures (especially during storage and core build).
• They influence manufacturing outcomes: burr-bridging risk, punchability/shear quality, and whether sheets stick during heat treatment.
• They change stacking factor (thicker films add insulation but can steal active steel cross-section), which is why coating choice can quietly move your B-field and temperature rise.
• They’re not one-size-fits-all: what helps a motor lamination line can be wrong for a transformer core.

CRGO is special because its “baseline coating” is not just a paint—it’s closely tied to the steel’s final high-temperature processing. Many grain-oriented electrical steels are supplied with a thin inorganic coating on the glass film layer that forms during annealing, typically only a few microns thick, balancing electrical resistance and stacking factor.

• Think of coating selection as a three-way trade: electrical isolation ↔ manufacturability ↔ magnetic/mechanical effects (tension, abrasion, sticking).
• If your core is sheared and stacked, you’ll care about different coating behaviors than if it’s wound.
• If you plan any stress-relief anneal, “high insulation” isn’t enough—you also need the coating to survive temperature and atmosphere.
• If your losses look good but your build yield is bad, you may have a manufacturing-mismatch coating (too abrasive, too fragile, or not compatible with your process).
• If your supplier only says “C5” without context, you’re missing the story that determines whether that “C5” helps or hurts.

The CRGO “glass film” baseline: what it is and why it matters

A lot of transformer engineers casually call the CRGO surface “coated,” but with grain-oriented steel the key starting point is the C-2 style mill glass / glass film: an inorganic layer formed during high-temperature annealing from the reaction of the annealing separator and the steel surface.

Some producers describe grain-oriented electrical steel as having two coating layers—a base layer and an additional coating—because the surface system can be engineered for insulation, corrosion resistance, and mechanical tension.

• C-2 (“mill glass” / “glass film”) is the native GO foundation: durable, high-temperature capable, and common in transformer applications.
• It can be abrasive, which is why it’s typically not chosen for stamped laminations when punchability and tool wear dominate.
• Many suppliers add a thin inorganic top coat over the glass film to tune insulation and stacking factor, often only ~2–5 μm thick.
• When you see a quote describing “glass film + insulation basis,” you’re effectively looking at a system, not a single layer.

The insulation classes you’ll see in specs: ASTM A976 (C-0 to C-6)

The most widely referenced “C-classes” come from ASTM A976, which classifies coatings by composition, relative insulating ability, and application guidance. Below is a practical, CRGO-focused interpretation of what these classes mean—especially when your end product is a transformer core.

What’s easy to miss is that the ASTM standard warns that product names in the market may resemble these classes, and you should confirm a coating truly conforms to the classification if it’s being sold under a similar label.

• C-2 and C-5 are the CRGO “main characters.” C-2 is the GO foundation; C-5 is a common “extra insulation” top layer over C-2 when needed.
• C-3 and C-6 are often motor-world tools (organic varnish systems), excellent for punchability and insulation, but typically limited by high-temperature processing.
• C-4 sits in the middle—inorganic/phosphate style, moderate insulation, better heat tolerance than most organics.
• The “right” class isn’t simply “higher is better”—it’s “aligned with your core design + fabrication + any anneal steps.”

So… which coating class should a transformer engineer choose?

Here’s the deeper way to think about it: your coating isn’t just insulation—it’s your manufacturing interface and your loss-control system at the same time. You choose it by asking: Where will current try to sneak across sheets? Where will my process damage insulation? And which thermal steps will punish the film?

A very common pattern in transformer work is:

• C-2 as the base “mill glass” foundation on CRGO.
• C-5 over C-2 when extra surface insulation is required—for example, sheared laminations for power transformer cores, where interlaminar resistance can be more challenged by edges, burrs, and stack geometry.
• Choose C-2 when your core style and volts/turn don’t demand extreme interlaminar resistance, and you value the robustness and heat tolerance of the GO glass film.
• Consider C-5 (often over C-2) when you’re pushing insulation needs higher (high volts/turn, demanding loss targets, or geometry/process that increases interlaminar shorting risk).
• Be cautious with organic varnish classes (C-3/C-6) for CRGO transformer cores if your process includes stress-relief annealing.
• Don’t forget the stacking factor angle: very thin inorganic coatings are often engineered to preserve stacking factor while still providing good resistance.

The quiet failure modes competitors don’t talk about

Many “overview” articles stop at definitions. In practice, the coating problems that cost you money don’t announce themselves as “wrong class”—they show up as noisy scrap trends, inconsistent core loss, or unexplained hot spots.

• Edge-burr bridging: even a great coating can’t save you if the cut edge creates metal-to-metal shorts across laminations.
• Coating damage during handling: abrasion, fingerprints/oils, or stacking pressure can lower effective surface insulation.
• Anneal atmosphere mismatch: some coatings survive heat but lose resistivity depending on neutral/reducing/oxidizing conditions.
• “Looks like C-5” ≠ “is C-5”: verify characteristics, not labels.
• Over-specifying insulation: very high insulation can sometimes trade against other priorities (e.g., friction/stacking behavior, or unnecessary cost) without meaningful system benefit.

How to verify coatings in a way that survives real life

If you want to surpass competitors, don’t just ask “what class is it?” Ask: how do we measure and control it? International standards exist specifically for this.

Standardized methods describe how to measure surface insulation resistance of electrical steel strip/sheet (useful for manufacturing and quality control of insulation coatings). Other methods define how to assess the thermal endurance of surface insulation coatings on electrical steel.

• Request coating verification aligned with recognized methods (e.g., surface insulation resistance testing practices).
• If your process includes thermal steps, ask for evidence of thermal endurance behavior for that coating system.
• For higher-insulation coating systems, specify acceptable test limits by agreement with your supplier and validate them with incoming inspection.
• When comparing suppliers, make sure you’re comparing after-process results (post-anneal resistivity, post-handling performance), not only “as supplied.”

A practical “buyer’s checklist” for CRGO coating discussions

A strong coating conversation with a mill or service center sounds less like “C-2 vs C-5” and more like “system behavior under my real constraints.”

• What is the base coating on the CRGO (e.g., C-2 glass film), and is there an additional top coat?
• Will we perform stress-relief annealing? If yes, which coating class is validated for it (and in what atmosphere)?
• Are laminations wound, sheared, or stamped—and does the coating’s abrasiveness/punchability profile fit the process?
• What is the expected surface insulation resistance range and how is it tested for QA/QC?
• If “C-5 over C-2” is proposed, what problem are we solving—volts per turn, edge bridging risk, or a particular loss/noise target?

Closing thought: treat coatings like part of the magnetic design

It’s tempting to treat coating class as procurement paperwork. But in transformer cores, the coating is part of the electromagnetic circuit, because it shapes how and where unwanted currents can flow. The best-performing CRGO designs tend to win not only on steel grade and core geometry, but on aligning the entire stack—cut quality, coating system, anneal steps, and QA measurement—so the insulation you paid for still exists after your process is done.

• If you want an easy first win: standardize how you specify C-2 vs C-5 over C-2 for different transformer families and volts/turn regimes.
• If you want the bigger win: align coating specs with how you actually fabricate and heat treat, and verify with standardized measurement methods.
• If you want the quiet win: train buyers and planners to ask “after my process, what does the coating still do?” rather than “what label is printed on the cert?”

If you’d like, tell me what transformer type you build (distribution vs power, wound vs stacked/sheared, any stress-relief anneal), and I’ll translate this into a one-page internal coating selection guide your team can use for RFQs and incoming inspection.

Internal links list source: